On 21/06/2010, Phil Steitz <p...@steitz.com> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>  > On 19/06/2010, Phil Steitz <p...@steitz.com> wrote:
>  >> sebb wrote:
>  >>  > [Third time lucky?]
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Please review and vote on the BSF 3.1 release.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > The artifacts are available at:
>  >>  >
>  >>  > http://people.apache.org/~sebb/bsf-3.1-RC3/
>  >>  >
>  >>  > The Maven artifacts are at:
>  >>  >
>  >>  > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebsf-004/
>  >>  >
>  >>  > The SVN tag is at:
>  >>  >
>  >>  > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/bsf/tags/bsf-3.1-RC3
>  >>  >
>  >>  > This will be renamed following a successful vote.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Keys are here:
>  >>  > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/bsf/KEYS
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > [ ] +1 I support this release.
>  >>  > [ ] -1 I am against releasing the packages (must include a reason).
>  >>  >
>  >>  > Thanks in advance!
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >>  > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >>  >
>  >>
>  >>
>  >> Sigs and hashes are good.  All else looks good; but I got this error
>  >>  when I tried "mvn clean test" from the source distro (JDK 1.6):
>  >>
>  >>  [INFO] Unable to find resource 'org.apache.bsf:bsf-engines:jar:3.1'
>  >>  in repository central (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2)
>  >>  Downloading:
>  >>  
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/ws/commons/axiom/axiom-impl/1.2.2/axiom-impl-1.2.2.jar
>  >>
>  >>  [INFO]
>  >>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>  >>  [INFO]
>  >>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  [INFO] Failed to resolve dependencies for one or more projects in
>  >>  the reactor. Reason: Missing:
>  >>  ----------
>  >>  1) org.apache.bsf:bsf-engines:jar:3.1
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  When I later did just "mvn" it seems to have downloaded / installed
>  >>  everything it needs, so "mvn clean test" subsequently succeeds.  I
>  >>  don't know if this is a real problem or not.
>  >
>  > This seems to be a general problem with multi-module maven testing.
>  >
>  > The command:
>  >
>  >   mvn package
>  >
>  > works OK, and performs tests, even if the jars have not been installed
>  > locally yet.
>  >
>  > However
>  >
>  >    mvn test
>  >
>  > does not work unless you do a prior install.
>  >
>  > I think that is a bug (or at the very least a sub-optimal design
>  > feature) in Maven.
>  >
>  >>  Might be good to add
>  >>  something to the BUILDING doc to indicate what you have to do first.
>  >
>  > This does already say to start by running:
>  >
>  >     mvn
>  >
>  > The default goal is install, so this will ensure that subsequent "mvn
>  > test" commands do succeed.
>
>
> Thanks, Sebb.

OK, NP.

>  +1 for the release.

Thanks!

Could I ask you please to add your vote to the restarted [VOTE] thread
so we keep the votes all together?

Sorry for any inconvenience.

>
>  Phil
>
> >
>  >>  Phil
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  Phil
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
>  >
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@jakarta.apache.org

Reply via email to