> On 18/10/2016, at 09:35, Steven Trogdon <strog...@d.umn.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:11:59 +1300 > François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 18/10/16 06:10, v...@ukr.net wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 21:55:18 +1300 >>> François Bissey <frp.bis...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> OK so I checked on my other machine. liblinbox.so should have been >>>> linked to (c)blas and so should have matrix_modn_dense_float.so >>>> independently. Because you didn’t get any complaints from ldd >>>> on liblinbox.so I’ll assume that it was missing/not properly >>>> detected when linbox was built. The way matrix_modn_dense_float.so >>>> is built also suggest that cblas was missing when built. >>>> >>>> What does >>>> pkg-config —libs cblas >>>> pkg-config —libs blas >>>> pkg-config —libs lapack >>>> report? >>>> >>> $ pkg-config --libs cblas >>> -lgsl >>> >>> $ pkg-config --libs blas >>> -lblas >>> >>> $ pkg-config --libs lapack >>> -lreflapack -lblas >>> >> >> Smells like a system using the main tree blas/lapack rather >> than the science overlay. I may have to enforce something >> there. Anyway those are very strange answers nonetheless. >> I would expect "-lgslcblas" not "-lgsl". If you have >> "-lreflapack" what blas are you using if not "refblas"? >> So does /usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so exist on your system? >> Is /usr/lib64/libblas.so a dangling symlink (point to nothing)? >> >> Francois >> >> > > OK, the blas does appear to be perhaps dangling, but the the cblas looks like > what was reported at https://github.com/cschwan/sage-on-gentoo/issues/429.
Good point Steve! I had forgotten about that. And since no one seems to care about https://github.com/gentoo-science/sci/pull/638 It is likely to stay that way unless I include it in the sage-on-gentoo overlay. Remember folks, gsl from the science overlay is broken. François
