Hi David, thank you very much for answer. I will proceed this way.
Regards, Jauhien On 01/11/2016 10:35 AM, David Grellscheid wrote: > Hi Jauhien, > > The package should certainly be called just Herwig from now on. I don't > know the Gentoo system well, but is it possible to do a transitional > meta-package Herwig++-3.0.0 that only has a hard requirement on > Herwig-7.0.0? This would help users with the transition. > > Thanks, > > David > > > On 03/01/2016 11:33, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Herwig 7.0.0 has been released recently: https://herwig.hepforge.org/ >> http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.01178. Its code base is a direct development >> of the Herwig++ code, but the name was changed to Herwig, as Herwig++ >> completely replaces old HERWIG now. >> >> The question is under what name should we package it now and how to >> proceed, so users get the expected updates? >> >> -- >> Jauhien >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> herwig mailing list >> her...@projects.hepforge.org >> https://www.hepforge.org/lists/listinfo/herwig >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
