My fault, I bet it were in science.
Your git suggestion led me to https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1e2193bbca8eaaab8cca1b4e61294b59f6a62714 "sci-geosciences/grass: Remove last-rited pkg" I'll ask if it is a version bumb strategy or Grass Gis (grass.osgeo.org) is going to be out of tree. Thank you, Fosco On 04/10/20 02:34, Aisha Tammy wrote: > On 10/3/20 5:31 PM, Fosco wrote: >> I found the homonym package, but they relate to different areas (genetic >> and geography). >> >> sci-geosciences/grass had an update at least few months ago (my last >> check is "late spring"). I remember the ebuild was a couple of minor >> version behind the master release. >> >> My believe is that there were no scheduled removal for that package. >> >> > I found a log from 2010 > > commit be508b7888b1d5e4bed1ec07efd9a544a8142b9d > Author: Christian Schmitt <ch...@ilovelinux.de> > Date: Mon Jun 14 13:45:37 2010 +0200 > > [sci-geosciences/grass] remove the grass version. better one available in > portage now > > So it seems like it has not been in science for a *really* long time. > > Aisha > > >> Possible tree corruption? >> >> Fosco >> >> On 03/10/20 21:17, Aisha Tammy wrote: >>> On 10/3/20 2:58 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: >>>> On 10/3/20 2:50 PM, Fosco wrote: >>>>> Hi all. >>>>> >>>>> I recently synced and found that sci-geosciences/grass has no available >>>>> ebuilds. >>>>> >>>>> I checked on https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sci-geosciences/grass >>>>> and the server returns 404. >>>>> >>>>> I checked with no luck for a move on https://gpo.zugaina.org/ . >>>>> >>>>> I didn't notice a "under removal" flag on Grass Gis recently. >>>>> >>>>> Am I missing something? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you >>> My apologies, seems I misremembered grass as pydap (which I removed) >>> >>> We still have a package sci-biology/grass present in the tree. >>> Perhaps this is the one that you meant? >>> >>> Aisha >>> >>>> Yes, grass was removed as it had not been updated in over 3 years. >>>> We are currently short of personnel to keep sci clean and update, so >>>> we removed the package. >>>> >>>> If you are interested in having grass present, we would love to get >>>> it back with a maintainer, even better if it has been updated upstream. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Aisha >>>> >
