Carlos <skyclan <at> gmx.net> writes:
> > End of dmesg files shows: > > usb 2-7: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 7 > > usb 2-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > > usb 2-7: USB disconnect, address 7 > > usb 2-7: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 8 > > usb 2-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice this shows several connection/disconnection cycles with address either ..../002/007 or .../002/008 > > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 128 Jun 8 23:54 001 > > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 129 Jun 8 23:54 002 > > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 130 Jun 8 23:54 003 > > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 131 Jun 8 23:54 004 > > crw-rw-r-- 1 root usb 189, 135 Jun 16 15:35 008 These devices have the absolute path of /dev/bus/usb/002/<001,002,003,005 or 008> > How was the device node chosen? It appears there is no device connected > to /dev/bus/usb/002, but rather /dev/bus/usb/008. see above > Although the software reports a permissions issue, perhaps the problem > is related to a bad choice of device node? I did nothing to create a device node. Kernel config issue? Custom udev rule? dbus trickery? Hal mystery (need dale on this one....) Dunno, that's why I posted, as to guidance on using a motorola (razor) phone with wammu, gammu or any other cell based software that works reasonably well with gentoo, are all valid snippets of information, of keen interest to me. James
