On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 04:39 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:34:25PM -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote: > > > The OP was over 3 months ago. I think a lack of response speaks volumes > > compared to responding so late. It was a thread that was DOA. Why did > > you decide to dig it up? > > The real reason is that I don't have time to track this list in a per > day, week or even in a per month basis. I don't think it's a problem > that much. > > Is there any reason to not answer, even late? Some problem are > blocking, some aren't and can be delayed a long time. Who knows? > Even if everything seems to show the problem is solved or turned around, > people usually like to understand what could have happen or have more > clues. I already had such feedback for problems older than one year. > > Now, what I was saying is more about "how to make my chances bigger to > have answers in general" than trying to explain "why a lack of > response". >
You are absolutely correct. Please continue with this thread. We look forward to your response in a month or so.
