Il giorno sab, 02/10/2010 alle 19.51 +0800, William Kenworthy ha scritto: > What are the implications of adding this "snippet" - will it come back > to bite us (users) when the next version of portage comes along? > No, it'll waste a bit of time if it's not removed because the same logic is running twice (once from lafilefixer, once from Portage), but they won't conflict one wit the other, that I can assure you of. > > - none of my systems have a /etc/portage/bashrc so Ive created them, > but > should they be executable, have a hash-bang line, ... ?
No need for anything, they are sourced so they can be non-executable and they don't need hash-bangs. > - will this snippet fix the problems with "equery check" marking > libraries as broken after lafilefixer is run? (I presume an emerge -e > world will be needed to update the database ...) The new installed packages with the above post_src_unpack won't cause any vdb-related issues because the files are fixed _before_ the merge to live filesystem and thus the modified file's md5 and mtime will be saved in it. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
