On Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:38:24 -0700 (PDT), BRM wrote: > > I think for ssh to work the user needs a valid shell, not nologin, so > > you can't do both of those suggestions.] > > Wouldn't a shell-less account per just provide the ability to use > SFTP/SCP? Those don't require a shell to operate.
Yes, and also things like rsync. -- Neil Bothwick In plumbing, a straight flush is better than a full house.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
