On Sunday 15 May 2011 19:15:16 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Sunday 15 May 2011 18:52:21 Mick wrote: > > On Sunday 15 May 2011 08:45:05 Adam Carter wrote: > > > I'm cloning a windows disk using gentoo; > > > > > > On the old 66GB disk; > > > # dd if=/dev/sdb of=/root/winmbr.bin bs=512 count=1 > > > # dd if=/dev/sdb1 bs=10M | gzip -v > winpartition.gz > > > > > > Then after swapping in the new 500GB disk; > > > dd if=/root/winmbr.bin of=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=1 > > > # gunzip -c winpartition.gz | dd of=/dev/sdb1 bs=10M > > > dd: writing `/dev/sdb1': No space left on device > > > 0+306 records in > > > 0+305 records out > > > 10137600 bytes (10 MB) copied, 0.109885 s, 92.3 MB/s > > > # fdisk -l /dev/sdb > > > > > > Disk /dev/sdb: 500.1 GB, 500107862016 bytes > > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 60801 cylinders, total 976773168 sectors > > > Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > > > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > > > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > > > Disk identifier: 0xe3f7e3f7 > > > > > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > > > > > > /dev/sdb1 * 206848 117207039 58500096 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT > > > > > > Why is dd saying no space left after copying 10MB when sdb1 is 65GB? > > > > Not sure if the bs=10M is too large? > > > > You can try finding the optimum size of the bs= value by creating a > > partition on the new disk, formating it and then run something like: > > > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024 count=1000000 of=/1G_test.file > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=2048 count=500000 of=/1G_test.file > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=4096 count=250000 of=/1G_test.file > > dd if=/dev/zero bs=8192 count=125000 of=/1G_test.file > > > > and compare the results that dd reports. bs=4096 often gives best > > performance (on my drives at least) but with the new 1T+ drives you may > > find that another block size does the job better. > > > > Then zero the drive first using dd: > > > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=4096 oflag=direct conv=notrunc > > > > and try repeating your restoring from back up with a more suitable block > > size. > > a) sector sizes are mentioned in the docu > b) compeletly unrelated.
You're right, but why is it stopping after the first 10M is transferred then? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
