On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:00:02 +0200, Neil Bothwick wrote about Re:
[gentoo-user] Cleaning redundant configuration files:

>On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:26:44 +0100, David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
>> Now, nearly everybody modifies /etc/updatedb.conf.  This does not
>> remove that name from mlocate's manifest.  So, Portage knows
>> precisely to which package the file belongs.  Hence I think your
>> assertion of "I don't know what this is," is specious.
>
>You have picked an excellent example, because mlocate is not the
>package that owns or has owned /etc/updatedb.conf, slocate does too.

Wrong.

One can (well, could) only have one of slocate and mlocate installed at
any given time.  Whichever one is installed owns /etc/updatedb.conf,
unless both have been unmerged and the file is a remnant, but it cannot
be owned by both.  Moreover, slocate has been deleted from the main
Portage tree, so it doesn't own anything any more.
-- 
Regards,

Dave  [RLU #314465]
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
dwn...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to