On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Michael Mol <mike...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <can...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Dan Johansson <dan.johans...@dmj.nu> wrote: >>>> > This is definitely not a choice that the gentoo disto made; it is coming >>>> > from several upstreams. >>>> >>>> I know it is from upstream but it still tastes really bad. ;-) >>> >>> I can only agree! >>> I am having /usr on a LVM volume on all systems (Gentoo and non Gentoo). >>> This will be a MAJOR issue if /usr needs to be on /. >> >> It is my understanding that /usr does *not* need to be on /, only that >> if you do, you will need an initramfs. Look at >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/72275 and the thread >> that followed it. > > ...and now I know that my entirely UUID-driven fstab may stop working, > if they choose not to add that particular "tweak/improvement".
...or you could, you know, use the genkernel generated initramfs, or dracut. Anyway, probably UUIDs and labels will be added to the minimal initramfs (it is my undrestanding it's kinda easy to do). The important thing is that it will be still supported. Regards. -- Canek Peláez Valdés Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
