On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 06:40:03PM +0100, Michael Mol wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:10 PM, LinuxIsOne <linuxis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Indi <thebeelzebubtrig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> In fact, I like gentoo and FreeBSD best for low-spoec hardware. > > > > What does low-spec hardware mean? > > Whatever the default setup of the latest release of Ubuntu runs > sluggish on. (Or what a previous version of Ubuntu ran on, but current > versions won't) > > While somewhat flippant, that seems a pretty reasonable way to think about it. >
Seems to me Ubuntu is sluggish no matter what hardware you have. Peopple pay such a high price to avoid learning anything... But I was thinking more about anything x86 or ppc and single core, or stuff like intel atom. Anything ARM. Anything pre core2duo from intel, for sure, as well as any ppc Mac. -- caveat utilitor ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤ ♫ ❤
