On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 23:48:29 +0100, Florian Philipp wrote:

> > This adds some checks which can prevent certain exploits if e.g. the
> > eix code has a bug.

> As I said, this description is hardly useful. If it fixes exploits, then
> why is it not enabled for non-hardened profiles per default?

It doesn't actually say that it fixes anything. It's more of a "it may
possibly prevent certain exploits using undefined, and maybe unknown,
bugs in the code". That's more a politician's language than a coder's.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Good fortune will find you provided you left clear instructions.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to