On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:07:30PM +0100, Marc Joliet wrote: > Am Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:29:40 +0700 > schrieb Pandu Poluan <pa...@poluan.info>: > > > On Feb 17, 2012 8:16 AM, "Peter Humphrey" <pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Thursday 16 February 2012 04:07:38 Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am one of those guys who are against initrd/initramfs :-P > > > > > > > > > > > > Congratulations! The first correct use of "one of those who" I've seen in > > several years. If only Americans would speak English! > > > > > > > ??? > > > > I'm not aware that there can be a 'wrong' usage of "one of those who"... > > I think he means "one of those who *are*" vs. "one of those who *is*".
Actually, the *is* variant would be (syntactically) correct, too. In that case he would be "you know, just one of those guys", who coincidentally is also against initrd/initramfs. Gosh, don't you just love languages and their syntax. :o) -- Gruß | Greetings | Qapla' I forbid any use of my email addresses with Facebook services. ...llaw eht no rorrim ,rorriM
pgpDGYPjY74uo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
