On 05/06/12 01:37, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Nikos Chantziaras<rea...@gmail.com> wrote:
Did you use gold or the standard linker?
The standard one. I didn't actually think about the importance of this.
Does gold work better with LTO?
I don't know much about it, but AFAIK gold is supposed to be several
times faster at linking in general, and when using it in combination
with gcc+LTO the compiler actually offloads some of the LTO processing
to the linker which is supposed to be more efficient.
Sounds like it's worth trying, but one thing doesn't look good; Diego's
blog is full of articles about Gold breakage:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/tag/gold
