On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 16:33:18 -0700
walt wrote:
> On 07/22/2012 10:41 AM, David Relson wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 18:23:47 +0200
> > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> >
> >> Am Sonntag, 22. Juli 2012, 09:52:06 schrieb David Relson:
> >>> /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
> >>
> >> how about moving that stuff away and creating a symlink to the
> >> correct version?
> >
> > Such a simple fix...
> >
> > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 was linked to libstdc++.so.6.0.8 rather than
> > 6.0.14.
> >
> > All is good now.
>
> I'm guessing that you have more than one version of gcc on the 32-bit
> machine? Any time you use gcc-config to change the working version of
> gcc, the symlink to libstdc++.so will also be changed automatically to
> point at the matching library version.
>
>
Nope. I only have gcc-4.5.3. Evidently symlink
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 didn't get updated when libstdc++.so.6.0.14 was
built.
FWIW, the machine has the following versions of libstdc++.so
6.0.14 - Jul 21 2012 ( in /usr/lib/gcc/.../4.5.3 )
6.0.8 - May 15 2007 ( in /usr/lib )
6.0.6 - Aug 3 2006 ( in /usr/lib )
Regards,
David
