On 24/01/13 21:15, Florian Philipp wrote:
Am 24.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Jacques Montier:
2013/1/24 microcai <micro...@fedoraproject.org
<mailto:micro...@fedoraproject.org>>
[...]
>>>>
>>>> Libreoffice-4.0 needs boost > 1.49 (so works with
boost-1.52.0-r5) and
>>>> Nightshade LSS (for planetarium but not in portage) needs boost
< 1.5
>>>> (so works with 1.49.0-r2).
>>>> Is it possible to install both 1.49 and 1.52 (in new slot) ?
update Nightshade to work with boost 1.52 is the only way to go.
[...]
I already tried that, but Nightshade doesn't compile with boost-1.52... :-((
I could rant about the stupidity that is boost and/or packages that
depend on it for some time but Flameeyes does a far better job at that.
I wonder what the view on bundled boost headers is with Gentoo devs.
I'm currently working on a project where I need boost, and now I'm
thinking about using BCP
(http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/tools/bcp) to bundle what I need
within the project. At least this would guarantee that the package
wouldn't be affected by this issue.
