On 03/27/2013 10:33 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On 03/27/2013 10:25 AM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> Ok... >> >> So, what is this all about? >> >> Does all of this mean that udev is now going *completely* away, >> *totally* replaced by systemd? >> >> If so, has there been any kind of formal announcement about this >> *anywhere*?? > > Hold your horses. > > The devs will work something out; systemd is not replacing the udev > package for all users. For the moment, it's just replacing the udev > package for users using systemd. > > The problem at the moment is a spat between the systemd maintainer and > the udev maintainer. They don't see eye to eye about which packages > should be providing which files (and where), and there's also a serious > miscommunication (and misinterpretation of historical communication) > issue between the two of them at the moment. They're trying to get it > worked out (via attempting cooperation or via arbitration, whatever is > necessary), and things will settle down. > > In the mean time, if I read the context right, this issue should only > affect people who are using systemd. This shouldn't be affecting people > who aren't using systemd.
(incidentally, to anyone who's following the issue, please correct me if I'm wrong...)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
