Tanstaafl wrote:
> I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I
> don't care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability
> and reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting
> capability...
>
>
As far as I know, it is actively maintained. Do I see the people
banging hammers, no. lol I did have a update on eudev tho:
Sun Feb 10 20:07:23 2013 >>> sys-fs/eudev-1_beta2-r2
merge time: 55 seconds.
This is from the changelog for eudev:
10 Mar 2013; Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> eudev-9999.ebuild:
Remove hacky export ac_cv_path_GPERF=true since the check is merged
upstream
10 Mar 2013; Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org> eudev-9999.ebuild:
Depend on gperf only if USE=keymap, bug #452760
20 Feb 2013; Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org>
files/40-gentoo.rules:
Sync 40-gentoo.rules with sys-fs/udev, bug #457868
*eudev-1_beta2-r2 (10 Feb 2013)
10 Feb 2013; Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org>
+eudev-1_beta2-r2.ebuild,
-eudev-1_beta2-r1.ebuild:
Rev bump to push out root fix, bug #456384
09 Feb 2013; Luca Barbato <lu_z...@gentoo.org> eudev-1_beta2-r1.ebuild,
eudev-9999.ebuild, +files/eudev-hwdb-offset-root.patch:
Update eudev ebuilds to support ROOT properly
It seems the latest change was March 10 which was not long ago. As I
mentioned earlier, I have plugged in USB sticks, cameras, printers and
such pretty regular. The eudev fork has worked fine for me. Servers
seem to worry less about *new stuff* since they usually run with what
they have at boot time anyway. Heck, mdev may would work fine for you
too.
It seems based on reading the -dev list that udev is about to introduce
some more changes. I'm hoping those don't affect me either. I just
noticed that someone else on this list has ran into the news message for
it too and has questions already.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how
you interpreted my words!
