Oooops, I meant option 3.1: 3.1 Create a new empty file:
touch /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules and reboot. The kernel will rename the interfaces hopefully as they were before. N. On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote: > I went into the kernel, rebuilt it with no changes (network driver was > already built as a module), rebooted and nothing changed. Option 2 > worked ok. > > As for the x86 machines, they were also updated blindly (94 packages > udev 200) included... 70-presistent file in rules.d and no problems. > eth0 was still eth0... > > N. > > On 4/7/13, Michael Hampicke <gentoo-u...@hadt.biz> wrote: >> Am 07.04.2013 20:08, schrieb Nick Khamis: >>> For those that have an error compiling udev 200: >>> >>> # emerge -1 XML-Parser >>> # perl-cleaner --all >>> >>> There was not mention of this in the news. Nor will the package pull >>> them in as a >>> dependency. >>> >>> N. >>> >>> On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Is changing it back to eth0 and eth1 like pulling teeth? >>>> >>>> N >>>> >>>> On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Ooops I should have been more specific the net cards are not esp5s0 >>>>> and esp6s0..... And the drivers for the network cards are built as >>>>> modules. >> >> This is most likely related to your previous world update. Maybe there >> was an update for perl, after which you did not run perl-cleaner. >> >> >