Oooops, I meant option 3.1:

3.1 Create a new empty file:

touch /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules

and reboot.  The kernel will rename the interfaces hopefully as they were
before.

N.

On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I went into the kernel, rebuilt it with no changes (network driver was
> already built as a module), rebooted and nothing changed. Option 2
> worked ok.
>
> As for the x86 machines, they were also updated blindly (94 packages
> udev 200) included... 70-presistent file in rules.d and no problems.
> eth0 was still eth0...
>
> N.
>
> On 4/7/13, Michael Hampicke <gentoo-u...@hadt.biz> wrote:
>> Am 07.04.2013 20:08, schrieb Nick Khamis:
>>> For those that have an error compiling udev 200:
>>>
>>> # emerge -1 XML-Parser
>>> # perl-cleaner --all
>>>
>>> There was not mention of this in the news. Nor will the package pull
>>> them in as a
>>> dependency.
>>>
>>> N.
>>>
>>> On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Is changing it back to eth0 and eth1 like pulling teeth?
>>>>
>>>> N
>>>>
>>>> On 4/7/13, Nick Khamis <sym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Ooops I should have been more specific the net cards are not esp5s0
>>>>> and esp6s0..... And the drivers for the network cards are built as
>>>>> modules.
>>
>> This is most likely related to your previous world update. Maybe there
>> was an update for perl, after which you did not run perl-cleaner.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to