On Saturday 20 Apr 2013 03:04:30 Joseph wrote: > On 04/20/13 01:13, Steven J. Long wrote: > > [snip]
> I am a holiday updater every second month or so; so at time to time I > something get screw up and I got caught in between. I was looking blindly > as I didn't really know what to look for. I turn out it was a problem with > recent gtk+ package. Usually portage is very good at the package versions it offers and as long as you don't mix stable and testing trees too much you should have a working system most of the time. I just resync'ed and can see that app-text/poppler-0.22.2-r2 is stable: ====================================================================== ~ $ eix -l app-text/poppler [I] app-text/poppler Available versions: (0/35) 0.22.2-r2 [cairo cjk curl cxx debug doc +introspection +jpeg jpeg2k +lcms png qt4 tiff +utils] (0/36) ~ 0.22.3 [cairo cjk curl cxx debug doc +introspection +jpeg jpeg2k +lcms png qt4 tiff +utils] Installed versions: 0.22.2-r2(0/35)(10:09:38 03/23/13)(cairo cxx introspection jpeg lcms png qt4 tiff utils -cjk -curl -debug -doc -jpeg2k) Homepage: http://poppler.freedesktop.org/ Description: PDF rendering library based on the xpdf-3.0 code base ====================================================================== I do not know why want to revert to a previous version, but if you must then the advice about using an ebuild from attic is what you should follow. > I'm not sure if building binary is a solution for me. Building a binary of already installed package(s) was offered as an option in case you want to revert to a previous version, *without* having to use a local overlay, or having to remerge an older version. -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.