On 24/07/2013 12:52, Pavel Volkov wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Yohan Pereira <yohan.pere...@gmail.com > <mailto:yohan.pere...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 24/07/13 at 02:00pm, Pavel Volkov wrote: > > It initially suported set arithmetic (you could writes expressions > like > > "@set1+@set2/@set3"), I wonder why it was dropped :) > > Wow thats intresting. What could the / operator possibly do in the case > of sets? > > > I'm not sure about the correct notation but I think it was intersection.
Difference actually :-) I can't think how intersection could be generally useful in portage sets. Maybe it was in the first draft just for completeness? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
