On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 09:40:45PM +0200, pk wrote > If *something1* at boot time requires access to *something2* at boot > time that isn't available then I would say that *something1* is broken > by design not the *something2*.
What about the case where *something2* *USED TO BE AVAILABLE, BUT HAS BEEN MOVED TO /USR* ? > So I would argue that devs relying on /usr always being there have > broken the "system". So I would argue that unnecessarily moving stuff into /usr is deliberate sabotage, designed to break *something1*. -- Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
