On Tuesday 27 May 2014 11:57:58 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 27.05.2014 09:59, schrieb Neil Bothwick: > >> Alternative: mount the subvol via option "subvolid" etc in fstab > >> .... if you plan to mount different snapshots, for example. > > > > I went with set-default for the root subvolume, if I need the root > > volume I can mount it with subvolid=0. > > Yes, just a question of preference. > > I prefer to specify a subvolid ... this won't lead to side-effects if > I ever might set-default to something else. > > But it's easier to use the defaul subvolid if you refer to that subvol > via grub2 or dracut etc ... > > Something I still learn about ... > > >> As far as I understand you are allowed to mount the root volume > >> (or academic: any subvol in a higher level) and use plain "mv" to > >> rename the subvols as if you renamed sub-dirs. > > > > rust me to overlook the easy way of doing things, I was looking for > > an equivalent to "zfs rename" and never considered mv. > > It feels somehow "wrong" to only mv them, right? ;-) > > > So far, btrfs looks good on my laptop - time to think about putting > > it on my desktop. > > Yeah, good luck with that. I am quite happy with btrfs so far ... no > problems or disadvantages so far. > > And the hourly snapshots of / and /home on my desktop are really nice > to have ;-) > > Stefan
I recall that zfs needed a lot of RAM >= 8M, is it the same with BTRFS? Also how big is each snapshot of / and why are these necessary on an hourly basiszfs ? -- Regards, Mick
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
