Am 20.10.2014 um 01:34 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann > <volkerar...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Am 19.10.2014 um 20:56 schrieb Rich Freeman: >>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:41 PM, James <wirel...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote: >>> As far as docs go - what specifically is unclear? Systemd is rapidly >>> evolving so things do get out of date, but for the most part stuff >>> like this can be found in man systemd.exec and such. Lennart's series >>> of blog posts on system administration using systemd is a very good >>> place to start. -- Rich >> and you are fine with that? That the package that becomes Pid1 is such >> an unstable, ever involving mess that not even the docs are keeping up >> with it? > If I wasn't fine with it I'd hardly be running Gentoo. :) You just > described half of the distro, though it isn't changing as rapidly as > it used to. > > Most of the issues are in the init scripts, which technically aren't > really part of systemd. It is fairly immature everywhere. If you > want a really stable experience then you should probably stick with > RHEL or Debian Stable. :) > >> You just gave me another reason not to use systemd. >> > Sounds like you didn't really need one. It is a free country - you're > no more required to run systemd than any Gentoo developer is required > to fix openrc init scripts or systemd units... > > -- > Rich > > . >
you make that sound like a threat. But that does not work with me ;) I have dealt with Slackware in the past. Had no probs back then, why should I be scared now?
