On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 9:54 AM, »Q« <boxc...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:43:21 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:32:08 +0100 Marc Stürmer wrote: >> > Am 29.11.2014 um 11:11 schrieb Pandu Poluan: >> > >> > > What do you think, people? Shouldn't we offer them our eudev >> > > project to assist? >> > >> > Since Eudev has always been opensource under the GPLv2, like udev >> > too, there's no need to /offer/ it. >> > >> > If they choose to use it, they can use it, no offer/questions >> > necessary. Simple. >> >> As far as I understand, Pandu meant "we can recommend them to use", >> but not some offer in commercial or proprietary terms.
Yup, that's what I meant. Sorry for the confusion; I'm not a native English speaker, so I may have used an improper verb there :-) > They've added something called "devuan-eudev" to their github workspace > today, <https://github.com/devuan/devuan-eudev>. It would be nice if > there could be one eudev project with the aim of supporting Gentoo, > Devuan, and whatever other distros want to use it. Or if there must be > multiple eudevs, it would be nice if the different teams could > communicate and maybe take some patches from each other. (I'm no dev, > so take my opinions on "what would be nice" for development with a > chunk of salt.) > Actually, that's my point by saying "offer": Rather than letting them build eudev from scratch, let's work together on the eudev we have, promote it to something distro-neutral, then let Gentoo and Devuan (and whatever other distros) derive from that 'upstream' Uh, I do make myself clear(er) here, don't I? Rgds, -- FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ • LOPSA Member #15248 • Blog : http://pandu.poluan.info/blog/ • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
