On 01/17/2016 10:10 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 1:03 PM, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote:
>>
>> I would prefer a method that is independent of OS used. And provides server 
>> side limitations with regards to filesharing and clipboard access.
>>
> 
> x2go is just X11, so it should be OS-independent as long as you have a
> client/server for it.  It just logs in as the appropriate user on the
> remote host, so access beyond that is whatever you'd get if you just
> logged in on a console.
> 
> Now, I can't vouch for how many OSes anybody has bothered to implement it on.
> 

Thanks for that tip on x2go - I'd struggled with freenx and eventually
gave up and freenx isn't even in the tree anymore.

I looked up x2go and rebuilt openssh on my home server as it suggested
to try it out. Other than restarting sshd, I didn't have to do any
configuration and it just *worked*. I've, like, never ever had that
happen before. Even when I set up my tigervnc with xinetd it was days of
experimenting before I got it to work. tigervnc also was hanging up X
upgrades, so now I can successfully ditch tigervnc.

x2go is so much faster it's unbelievable. I have a gigabit LAN here at
home and VNC was lagging pretty badly (to the point where I decided
against even trying to use it remotely.)

Some things to note: there's no android client, but there is one for
Windows/linux/MacOS. I haven't tried it on my Windows laptop yet, but
one of these days I'll dig it out and try it.

Makes me wonder if it would be possible to spin up a VM on demand with
x2go on and preconfigured if OP requires users not to be on the same host.

Dan

Reply via email to