-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
> > Gentoo is supporting officially Snap packages? Why not Flatpak? > Gentoo support for Snap is roughly as "official" as RedHat/Fedora support. See also https://www.happyassassin.net/2016/06/16/on-snappy-and-flatpak-business-as-usual-in-the-canonical-propaganda-department/ Quoting from there: "The sum total of communication between Canonical and Fedora before the release of this press release was that they mailed us asking about the process of packaging snappy for Fedora, and we told them about the main packaging process and COPR. They certainly did not in any way inform Fedora that they were going to send out a press release strongly implying that Fedora, along with every other distro in the world, was now a happy traveler on the Snappy bandwagon." - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXZwilXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRDMjhGQ0IwRjdCRUQxMzdBQUNCMDJEODlB NDRDRjM3M0U3RUU5OUU0AAoJEKRM83Pn7pnkEBwP/AsWgBFxM4ycw7abuASz3ENP n2EF7oxvp2cIYDjKmyfhCkLHsGMYj6PmreFIE7Gb8dQI3FlAxqvt15fOasqL89x3 PXmLIqEuYsWVFWpuFjXOZbOad2D/qOBOta1bkBKDKoxZ4eBoGrplRdQpdf0E1fpm /3EaTh4mrgHBwuISI61QhsO5EHFZb5WBiQPwi7FNTjnGr35cPuyTzyjj7XF2wdfC 8Roc+d9VTdM9goB5ZQEZxKNMqpfSUjWcs4cwtknNCr+n2p+J9Hqs1rGdleNGS3FV VkCmCeLADlD20VrBRXxxop8e+NTFjJ5akRTIzM7JxnbcWXX7US5IcjO4u7ZRsDcQ LaYhLnJHGWXHWaGsiwytS3oCnrQIxORAfgkgSwa9+ioJb5ijSp3nEMfLxHwX+Bh4 Mu7Xb5JwnOLn8RK6Ygor64Wh16jhWk/yCoNUga2NSQt5DPnnGCaug+NleGeGpyWz usy0dsDeRY4khJEQsN2VOZ73CtDi78qGg8PkuFwdcQlOirdi5ox+t3tuaRhcYHLP W8F2c4yKc75NHui9f8ZZv5pytFGL5c86aNBh8U5K/FJxgpFdZC98JG3UuSUmCobC UkfHlGJnxvrBMRDgtJMNfRrDCIU3vn0zw+yO2sQxzAjVYfSVa6sHLkV/2b1z1U4I yShvdML92FrqhYo68yJ+ =nSym -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
