Am Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:26:50 +0300 schrieb Andrew Savchenko <birc...@gentoo.org>:
> Checksums are indeed wrong, whirlpool one too. Thanks for noticing, > I opened a bug for this: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=588062 Okay, thank you. This has been now marked as a duplicate of another bug[1], which in turn links to a message on the gentoo-mirrors ML[2] from about a month ago. I am not sure I understand the implications. Are the amd64 images all corrupt, and thus should not be used for installation? If so, they should not be linked to on the main download site. If not, can someone with access to the GPG signing key please publish the correct checksums signed somewhere so we have an interim workaround? > In future please file bugs for similar issues right ahead. Noted. Greetings Marvin [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581638 [2]: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-mirrors/message/a9fbc7213f832e9918784bb8d334628b -- Blog: http://www.guelkerdev.de PGP/GPG ID: F1D8799FBCC8BC4F
