On 161223-17:58+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 161223-05:38+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > It took me all of my skills ;-) . But I installed Pale Moon > ... > > That's new technology. EAPI=6 in the ebuild > > Nothing I've seen in my previous 7 years as Gentoo ... > > The git object pack sources, guess where they are by looking up: > > # du -hs /usr/portage/distfiles/git3-src\ > EGIT_MIRROR_URI\=git\:/localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/cgi-bin_cgit.cgi_Pale-Moon.git/*/ > > 48K /usr/portage/distfiles/git3-src > EGIT_MIRROR_URI=git:/localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/cgi-bin_cgit.cgi_Pale-Moon.git/hooks/ > > 8.0K /usr/portage/distfiles/git3-src > EGIT_MIRROR_URI=git:/localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/cgi-bin_cgit.cgi_Pale-Moon.git/info/ > > 283M /usr/portage/distfiles/git3-src > EGIT_MIRROR_URI=git:/localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/cgi-bin_cgit.cgi_Pale-Moon.git/objects/ > > 744K /usr/portage/distfiles/git3-src > EGIT_MIRROR_URI=git:/localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/cgi-bin_cgit.cgi_Pale-Moon.git/refs/ > > # > > ( reformatted the above output for email, but those are 5 distinct lines of > stdout only ) > ... > > What is needed in the /etc/portage/make.conf is: > > EGIT3_STORE_DIR=${DISTDIR}/git3-src" > EGIT_MIRROR_URI=git://localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/" > > ( Note at proofreading time: true, that is still stuck in the make.conf, > and it is what was in there when the successful install happend, but > shouldn't it be http://localhost/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/ instead? )
I tried changing that (and updated, the Air-Gapped way, to www-client/palemoon-27.0.3-r7 (which is my local bump of www-client/palemoon-27.0.3-r1 from unofficial) , and the only difference is that now, the top dir in /usr/portage/distfiles/ looks: # ls -l /usr/portage/distfiles/git3-src\ EGIT_MIRROR_URI\=http\:/ total 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 portage portage 4096 2017-01-10 02:54 localhost # while previously was: EGIT_MIRROR_URI\=git\:/ instead of what is now: EGIT_MIRROR_URI\=http\:/ The rest is all the same. But, again, Palemoon works just fine. And my wonder about it still remains. But it works, and seems a reliable method. Just thought to make clear on this. This email should appear in reply to where I explained it as really the best I could. -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature