Rasmus.thomsen <rasmus.thom...@protonmail.com> schrieb am So., 30. Apr. 2017, 12:19:
> Hello, > > it's entirely possible to replace gcc for clang for *most* packages, > however some will not build currently and will require you to set up a > package.env file with entries for those packages (like described on clang's > wiki entry). Clang usually compiles faster than GCC does, but produces > slower binaries (at least for me). Also, clang offers flto=thin, which > doesn't require as much ram as gcc's lto > > Regards, > Rasmus > > > Sent from ProtonMail mobile > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > On 30 Apr 2017, 12:11, < tu...@posteo.de> wrote: > > > Hi, > > before I do a lot of reconfiguring, recompiling and finally > do the same thing again in the opposite direction: > > What are the experiences to replace gcc with clang for either > only userland tools or the whole system (with haveing gcc as > fallback)? > Is it worth the effort? > What are the benefits and the drawbacks? > > Thanks for any input in advance! > Cheers > Meino > > Hi, There is a tracking bug about what does not compile with clang. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408963 >
