On March 15, 2018 9:35:35 PM UTC, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 2018-03-15, the...@sys-concept.com <the...@sys-concept.com> wrote: > >> I've compiled the pdftk-9999 (java based) >> gcc-5.4.0-r4 is gone and pdftk is working as it should. >> >> Thank you everybody for the help. > >That's great news! > >Instead of removing pdftk from the portage tree because it depends on >gcc-5.4 [gcj], is there any reason it can't be replace by the one >which uses a jvm instead?
Someone needs to maintain it as well. -- Joost -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
