On 01/29/2019 01:08 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Obviously. Hence the reason I said that it shouldn't matter if the
module is built in-kernel.
I'm saying it does matter.
I'm not sure why it seems like we're talking past each other here...
You seem to be focusing on the second kernel that the initramfs execs.
I'm talking about the first kernel that the initramfs uses.
The initramfs won't be able to do crap if it doesn't have the device and
file system drives necessary for the initramfs kernel & init scripts to
boot.
Now, it might not support a kernel that doesn't support module loading
at all, though I'm not sure why not. If it doesn't I could see why the
developers wouldn't be bothered to address the use case.
Yet another possible reason to dislike dracut.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
