Sven Köhler wrote: >> Yesterday I updated from glibc-2.4-r1 to glibc-2.4-r2. Since then, >> I've got problems with my UTF-8 locale. I suppose, that is because >> the UTF-8 denomination seems to have changed from .UTF-8 to .utf8: > > .UTF-8 changed from .utf8?
Yep. > That's not true. Wrong, it is. > My glibc 2.3.6 (with userlocales turned off) never > creates such locales. There's no such flag as "userlocales". > I also looked it up on a Redhat-System: no .UTF-8 locales. Well. > What might have been the last glibc-version with UTF-8 locales? 2.3.6-r3 or 2.4-r1 Alexander Skwar -- QOTD: "If I'm what I eat, I'm a chocolate chip cookie." -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list