quit fucking email bombing me you ass holes.


From:  Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To:  gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
To:  gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject:  Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems
Date:  Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:25 +0200
MIME-Version:  1.0
Received:  from robin.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102]) by bay0-mc2-f10.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 28 May 2006 15:14:51 -0700
Received:  from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k4SMD7KS003610;Sun, 28 May 2006 22:13:07 GMT
Received:  from cicero2.cybercity.dk (cicero2.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.53])by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4SMALei017832for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 28 May 2006 22:10:21 GMT
Received:  from user2.cybercity.dk (user2.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.35])by cicero2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DA9244F08for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received:  from BA.zlin.dk (port78.ds1-abs.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.227.17])by user2.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB172869D7for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 May 2006 00:10:20 +0200 (CEST)
>Sunday 28 May 2006 21:48 skrev Hemmann, Volker Armin:
> > > This change could be a
> > > bugfix. By making your own digest you don't get this bugfix...
> >
> > more probably - the mirror corrupted the file. Or someone replaced it with
> > a hacked package.
>
>While that is possible I'm not really sure why you consider it more likely.
>
>At least in my case this bug showed when I upgraded from perl-cleaner-1.03 to
>perl-cleaner-1.03-r1. Those two ebuilds are identical and use the same tar
>file as source. This means that when I originally (a couple of weeks ago)
>installed 1.03 the digest fitted the other, smaller tar file, which means
>that devs has approved both versions of that tar file). It did install
>successfully (and seemed to work) so it couldn't be too corrupted.
>
>So while it is possible that the devs approved a file that shouldn't have been
>approved, I prefer to think that upstream just did something stupid by
>upgrading the package without a revision bump.. :)
>
>--
>Bo Andresen

><< attach3 >>



Join the new Messenger beta now -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Reply via email to