On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:40:23 -0700 Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RF> On 7/26/06, Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RF> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:58:23 -0700 Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RF> > RF> > RF> On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RF> > RF> > Of course I can but I want to point out that this should RF> > RF> > happen occasionally. I reported several packages to be RF> > RF> > keyworded for amd64 year ago and none of them is stable yet. RF> > RF> > So it seems to me that this is not "bug", this is a "rule". RF> > RF> RF> > RF> Are these packages stable for x86? RF> > RF> > Yes, they are stable for x86. RF> RF> Can you give an example or two? net-im/tkabber ..and its dependencies: dev-tcltk/tclgpgme dev-tcltk/tclxml dev-tcltk/tclxml-expat dev-tcltk/tkTheme dev-tcltk/tkXwin app-text/cwtext app-text/txt2pdbdoc net-analyzer/etherape app-emacs/table x11-plugins/wmweather+ x11-plugins/docker app-mobilephone/scmxx app-emulation/fuse (no maintainer) app-emulation/libspectrum x11-plugins/mountapp app-mobilephone/smssend Robert -- Robert Cernansky E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
