On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael Crute wrote:
> On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
>> > Which is the best for organization mail server.
>>
>> NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
> I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is
> arguably THE MOST secure mail server
> (http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html).
Actually, it is NOT. DJB made this statement but he doesn't
stand to it. See http://home.pages.de/~mandree/qmail-bugs.html
for a quite big collection of bugs and RFC violations of qmail.
To quote from that page:
I'm not here to start a war over the merits of any one MTA... but I
think it's worth reading DJBs rebuttal of the accusations made by
Postfix's author.
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/venema.html
--
________________________________
Michael E. Crute
http://mike.crute.org
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended
up where I intended to be. --Douglas Adams
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
