On 2006-12-29, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> how about media-sound/audacious ? >>>> its a nice and lightweight player. >>> >>> Lightweight?? >>> >>> It's the biggest virtual memory user on my system with a >>> virtial set size of 58M and resident set size of 14M. The only >>> thing with a slightly larger resident size is the X server. >>> >>> Audacious takes three times as much memory as Apache. > > PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND > 10124 michael 15 0 113m 30m 22m R 0.5 4.9 0:02.38 amarokapp
Damn. Compared to that, I guess audacious is lightweight. I probably need to re-calibrate my "weight-meter". > and that's when it's not playing anything! When streaming the > %CPU goes up to 8.5-9.0. > > I'm missing xmms too. I hope xmms2 will eventually be > developed enough to use as a stable package, but without the > bloatware that winamp has become. -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Should I get at locked in the PRINCICAL'S visi.com OFFICE today -- or have a VASECTOMY?? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list