> -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Barkalow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 December 2006 05:28 > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] I want my xmms > > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, maxim wexler wrote: > > > > Will audacious not work for you? > > > > Haven't tried yet. Fellow down the list says it's a > > resource hog like mplayer. > > I don't have xmms any more to compare against, but audacious > seems to be > almost identical to it as far as I can tell. As far as memory > usage, it's > much less than, say, firefox. It is presently at the top of > my CPU usage, > but it's still only taking 1% of the CPU, so it's hard to complain. > > -Daniel > *This .sig left intentionally blank* > -- > gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list > >
I moved to amarok, I might give audacious a shot. What about noatun for a smallish player? Not sure on it's RAM usage. Also look at Quod Libet or Banshee which are meant to be similar in features to amarok but lighter in terms of resource usage (or so I hear). David Note: These views are my own, advice is provided with no guarantee of success. I do not represent anyone else in any emails I send to this list. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
