On Thursday 31 May 2007 04:57:53 Paul Varner wrote:
> > But at least it will never use the horrible hack that revdep-rebuild uses
> > with --package-names because of the lack of support for the
> > =category/package-version:slot syntax in portage-2.0* which it still
> > supports.. :)
>
> Hey, I'm proud of that horrible hack!

Didn't say you shouldn't be. It was necessary when you made it.

> However, on that note, I can't wait to get rid of it and use the
> =category/package-version:slot syntax. I've been strongly thinking of
> doing it in 0.2.4 which is in the pre-release cycle right now.

The equal sign was a mistake. I've actually been meaning to poke you about 
that. At the same time you should drop the --emptytree parsing and just 
use --deep directly. With the circular deps in the tree now that gets much 
better results.

:)

-- 
Bo Andresen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to