On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote:
> > In <news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >
> > "Hemmann, Volker Armin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > > > b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get
> > > > > attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub?
> > >
> > > I did.
> > >
> > > And after some arguments a different dev came in and recognized the
> > > bug as a real bug...
> >
> > I've seen that happen a few times. IME, jakub is usually right, but
> > whether he's right or wrong he's very stubborn. It's possible to
> > wrangle the bug yourself, asking another dev to have a look at it,
> > instead of arguing with Jakub until somebody notices.
>
> Jakub is like a spam filter who filters out 100% of the spam. Sadly, he
> filters a fair amount of ham too - and if your ham got filtered the option
> to get it recognized as ham are hard to find and not easy to use ;)
>
> His user interface could be improved....
Maybe someone should submit a bug report....
http://www.xkcd.com/c258.html
I tried . Critical bug, but was considered 'invalid' by the prayer-wranglers.
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNOSPicAMreil [EMAIL PROTECTED]"[(2*x)..(2*x+1)]}'
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
