Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote: >> With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in >> general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable? > > I use it fairly often still, but do notice I get a lot of null > output. So I no longer trust it fully. At least it doesn't give > false positives - what's in the putput really is a valid depend.
Do you know off hand if there are any alternatives?
