2009/1/16 Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> > Alejandro wrote: > > > > > > 2009/1/15 Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk <mailto:n...@digimed.co.uk>> > > > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote: > > > > > > You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the > > block > > > > for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled > by > > > > recent portage releases. > > > > > are you sure that his works in this case? This blocking bug was > some > > > time before the new Portage went stable and back then you had to > > > resolve it by hand. > > > > That's right, but now the new portage is stable so it is handled on > > stable systems. The block was handled automatically when it first > > appeared > > on ~arch systems. > > > > > > -- > > Neil Bothwick > > > > Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they taste funny? > > > > > > Which version of portage do this? I am on amd64 stable and have the > > problem a couple of week ago, and i don/t remember any portage update,,, > > I know portage-2.2_rc20 works well. I have not had any trouble on mine > and you may want to give it a shot. It is still keyworded I think but > it does handle the blocks very well. > > Your choice on whether to install or not. > > Dale > > :-) :-) > > Thanks for th einfo! I will give a try...
Cheers!
