On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:00:33 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: > > cat /etc/portage/sets/kde4.3 >>/etc/portage/package.keywords > > Or make package.keywordsa directory and simply put a copy of the sets > > file in there (or a symlink to the sets file). This is the more > > manageable option. > Interesting approach. I usually like to follow the gentoo recommended > practices. I get the feeling that "sets" via portage 2.2 is very > much a work in progress. So which of these approaches is likely > to become the de'facto method?
The Gentoo approach has always been to handle package.keywords yourself, autounmask is an unofficial utility. I hope there will be the facility to add a set to the file in future. > Also, I omitted the "~amd64" at the end of all of those manual > entries into my package.keywords file. It work without them. > So my question is the "-amd64" entry on every line of my > package.keywords deprecated now with portage 2.2? It's always been like that (well, for a very long time, at least). If you don't specify an arch in the file, it uses the testing variant of whatever you have in make.conf. -- Neil Bothwick Do you steal taglines too?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
