2009/3/30 Neil Bothwick <n...@digimed.co.uk>: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:53:30 +0200, Daniel Pielmeier wrote: > >> So as far as I see the new qt meta ebuild wasn't needed at any time. > > So every ebuild, in the tree and all overlays, was updated before the > split ebuilds were introduced? >
I don't know the exact progress but I think the split ebuilds were introduced masked, then the dependencies have been adjusted accordingly. After the transition was done the ebuilds have been unmasked. -- Regards, Daniel
