On Tuesday 25 August 2009 23:04:12 Grant Edwards wrote: > Last week on all my systems emerge upgraded firefox (3.5.2-r1) > and xul-runner (1.9.1.2-r2). > > Now it's decided it wants to downgrade all of them to 3.0.13 > and 1.9.0.13. > > Looking at the package database page, I see that firefox > 3.5.2-r1 is marked as unstable (~x86). Same for xulrunner > 1.3.1.2-r1. That explains why emerge wants to downgrade to the > stable version: I don't have ~x86 unmasked for > firefox/xulrunner and never have had. > > What I don't understand is why they got upgraded last week. > > Were firefox 3.5.2 and xulrunner 1.9.1.2 marked as stable last > week and then changed back to unstable this week?
IIRC someone posted in the last few days that firefox and xulrunner were briefly stable for a few hours. fwiw, firefox-3.0.13 and xulrunner-1.9.0.13 are ~arch here, I synced two hours ago and my mirror is 8-12 hours behind the master. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
