On Thursday 03 September 2009 16:39:07 econti wrote: > Hi all > after two months I made a world upgrade. All went well, but when I ran > "revdep-rebuild" I received this: > > localhost ~ # revdep-rebuild > * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild > > * Checking reverse dependencies > * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package update > * will be emerged. > > * Collecting system binaries and libraries > * Generated new 1_files.rr > * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH > * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr > * Checking dynamic linking consistency > [ 46% ] * broken > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libstdc++.la (requires > -lgcc_s_32) > * broken /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.4/32/libsupc++.la > (requires -lgcc_s_32) > [ 51% ] * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires > -lneatogen) * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires > -lgvrender) * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libcircogen.la (requires > -lcommon) * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotgen.la (requires > -lgvrender) * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotgen.la (requires > -lcommon) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -ldotgen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -ltwopigen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lfdpgen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lcircogen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lneatogen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lgvrender) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libdotneato.la (requires -lcommon) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lneatogen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lgvrender) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libfdpgen.la (requires -lcommon) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libgdtclft.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libgvrender.la (requires -lcommon) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libneatogen.la (requires -lgvrender) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libneatogen.la (requires -lcommon) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ldotgen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -ltwopigen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lfdpgen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lcircogen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lneatogen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lgvrender) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtcldot.la (requires -lcommon) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtclplan.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtkspline.la (requires -ltkstub8.4) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtkspline.la (requires -ltclstub8.4) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lneatogen) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lgvrender) > * broken /usr/lib64/graphviz/libtwopigen.la (requires -lcommon) > [ 64% ] * broken /usr/lib64/libgnomeprint.la (requires -ldb1) > * broken /usr/lib64/libgnomeprint.la (requires -lxml) > [ 100% ] > > I tried re-emerging graphviz and libgnomeprint without any result. It is > the first time this happens since I have been using gentoo. Could you > give me any tip?
Did you let revdep-rebuild proceed to rebuild the packages *it* knows that need rebuilding, or did you thumbsuck and manually rebuild the packages *you* think need rebuilding? -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
