2009/10/2 Arthur D. <spinal...@mail.ru>: > Joshua Murphy <poiso...@gmail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Fri, 02 Oct 2009 > 09:58:33 +0300: > >> every Gentoo system has vi, there just isn't a direct >> symlink with that name to busybox. > > Wow, that's a really great problem. > $ ln `which busybox` vi > $ ./vi > > -- > Best regards, Spinal
Yeah... imagine that. A simple change to fix things to work as I want when I deviate from the distro default. Interestingly, I already do that, and into /bin/, on every lightweight system I build for myself (more full fledged builds have vim, and none of my builds keep nano around). Really, that seems just as simple to me as adjusting the config file for sudo when deviating from the distro-offered default. Simple solutions are an amazing thing, at least, when they're not blown away as unacceptable because the world doesn't revolve around every single person who think's they're at Burger King (oddly enough, in my experience, you don't actually get "your way" their either). I would apologize for my rather sarcastic mannerisms in my comments here and there in the thread, but when the initial post is so terribly combative, I just can't help myself. -- Poison [BLX] Joshua M. Murphy
