Stroller wrote: > > On 4 Oct 2009, at 15:54, Justin wrote: >>> ... >>> Did you read the part of my message where I said that: >>> >>>>> I'm running x86 (NOT ~x86), and all versions of postgresql-server >>>>> are marked with a ~. >> >> You are right but the problem should be solved 'cause it isunmasked >> again. >> I couldn't imagine a dev masking something where there is no stable >> alternative. > > I've just synced and it still seems to be ~ only. > > Am I reading this wrong? > http://packages.gentoo.org/package/dev-db/postgresql-server > > I'm thinking to file a "no stable ebuild for PostgreSQL server", but I'm > just cautious in case I'm overlooking something stupid and obvious. > > Stroller. > > You missunderstood me. The keyword situation is the same, means -doc and -base are stable but -server not. But the masking of dev-db/postgresql is reverted. So you will not have any problems.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
