On Tuesday 23 March 2010 16:04:04 Mick wrote: > Do you know why it behaves differently with -no- > oosplash, when the binary installation does not seem to be bothered either > way?
It seems the binary package doesn't install the optional oosplash.bin program. The code responsible for the differing results lies in the last 25 lines of /usr/lib64/openoffice/program/soffice. Cheers, Steve